What Was Bill Richardson Thinking?

 bill-richardson.jpg

On October 4 Democratic presidential candidate Bill Richardson, who also happens to be the governor of New Mexico, essentially committed a personal political drowning here in the Great Lakes region. Mr. Richardson, who is campaigning hard to win the Nevada’s presidential caucus on January 9, the nation’s second such contest, told the Las Vegas Sun the following:

“I want a national water policy,” he is quoted as telling the newspaper. “We need a dialogue between states to deal with issues like water conservation, water reuse technology, water delivery and water production. States like Wisconsin are awash in water.”

The thirsty desert Southwest, which has suffered through a years-long drought, may be one of the fastest growing regions in the nation, and most profligate users of fresh water, but when it comes to voting numbers, especially electoral college voting numbers, it is quite literally a political drop in the bucket compared to the Great Lakes region. And the voters of the Great Lakes states aren’t about to easily turn over management of the world’s largest source of clean freshwater to either the water-wasting cities of the Southwest or to the ideological and donor-driven legislators who run the national government.

Here in the Great Lakes states we understand the value of freshwater in a world where one-third of the population does not have access to enough water to comfotably live, and where so much water is being polluted, drained, and mismanaged that two-thirds of the world’s population could suffer the same fate by 2025, according to a recent United Nations report. 

So Governor Richardson may have made some political friends, and courted some votes in Nevada and the Southwest with his remarks. But his ability to court support in the Great Lakes region, and win the White House, just ended. The evidence of that statement is told in the numbers.

A presidential candidate must marshal 270 of the 538 electoral votes to win. The total 2006 population of Utah, Nevada, New Mexico, Arizona, and Colorado was 17.4 million, and the number of electoral votes for that region was 34. The total population of the eight Great Lakes states — Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin — is 83 million, or 28 percent of all Americans.  And though it’s experienced grave difficulty making the transition from the 20th to the 21st century, five of the 10 largest states are in the Great Lakes region. That is why these eight states collectively retain 141 electoral votes, or more than half of the votes needed to win the White House

Wisconsin may be, as Mr. Richardson asserts, awash in water. But when he comes courting votes there and in the other Great Lakes states, he’ll find his wellspring of support bone dry. 

  

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

*

8 comments on “What Was Bill Richardson Thinking?

  1. Cara says:

    I may be a poor, simple, desert feeb, but I don’t see anything alarming in what Bill Richardson said about water policy, and in fact I think that while his words are being twisted to imply that he wants to drain the great lakes to provide us with fresh water, what he wants, in fact, is to push for conservation, something we all need to practice.

    Why is responsibility so out of fashion?

  2. Cara:
    How interesting that geography shapes perspective. In this part of the country people view such an assertion by a desert politician as a threat to take from the Great Lakes, not a call for conservation. Indeed, the people and businesses of the Southwest need to conserve, just as the people in the Midwest do. But in Richardson’s statement there is something more at work, the idea that a resource exists outside his region that could be tapped for national purposes. It’s a hint of the magnitude of the problem of water scarcity and the recognition that conservation is not likely the only solution. Best, Keith

  3. Jayden Scott says:

    nowadays, we are seeing some water shortage and water conservation is even more necessary`:`

  4. Abbie Hunt says:

    water conservation should be done because we are already having some water shortage these days.*,

  5. there is always a need for water conservation specially these days where natural reources are scarce”,.

  6. water conservation is really needed nowadays because of the growing population-‘~

  7. To be able to distribute water fairly and efficiently can be complicated in some places because water resources often span political boundaries. Even though a government would like to recognize the ability to water, its relationship with neighboring nations might impinge upon being able to do so. Additional problems, the one that increases in seriousness with each passing year, is there is certainly simply less water to go around. Poor agricultural practices and also the expansion with the world?s deserts have gone some places without water to communicate in of.

  8. Excellent blog! I genuinely love how it’s easy on my eyes as well as the information are well written. I am wondering how I might be notified whenever a new post has been made. I have subscribed to your rss feed which need to do the trick! Have a nice day!