Flip: Interactively Documenting Factory Farms

 factory-farm-peter-rosset.jpg

Among the priority hazards of joining capital and technology the way we do in the 21st Century is that it can blow up the ordinary and familiar — a farm, for instance — into shapes and sizes that are extraordinary. That is what’s happening in Michigan and in many other states in animal agriculture. American meat, poultry, and milk, increasingly, are produced on immense sites that have come to be known as “factory farms.” For those who haven’t followed this development, one problem is that confining huge numbers of animals produces quantities of manure that often exceed the levels of raw sewage produced by major cities.  A second problem is that neither the federal government nor the states require modern waste water pollution controls. Owners of factory farms, several of them multi-billion dollar food companies, have convinced state legislators they are mere farmers, unable to afford the settling basins, digesters, and filtration equipment that municipalities have used for years to clean their waste water. Instead they generally dump manure into smelly lagoons that inevitably leak and pollute the nearest stream or lake. 

In this edition of Flip, Mode Shift’s spotlight of useful applications of Internet technology, we draw your attention to the interactive Factory Farm Map, which details how many factory farms there are in the United States, and does so state by state, county by county, and sector by sector. The map, for example, can show you have many factory dairy farms there are in Barry County, Michigan (3), the number of factory hog farms in Allegan County (38), and how many cattle operations exist in Huron County (13). The Factory Farm Map is a genuine breakthrough in data gathering and presentation for a sector of the agriculture industry that is deserving of the pubic attention it is starting to attract. 

My organization, the Michigan Land Use Institute, has been interested in factory farms  since our founding in 1995.  Patty Cantrell, who wrote “Hog Wars,” a first-of -its-kind report on the subject while working for the Missouri Rural Crisis Center early in her career, brought that expertise to Michigan in 1998 and helped build the statewide campaign to limit the expansion of factory farms. Three years ago, Stephanie Rudolph, an intern from Haverford College then and now a graduate fellow at the Institute, reported on the worst of all factory farm polluters in Michigan, the Vreba-Hoff dairy farms of Hillsdale County. In 2004, Governor Jennifer M. Granholm’s administration brought sanctions against the farm that have curtailed pollution.  

The Factory Farm Map was produced by Food and Water Watch, a non-profit healthy food organization founded last year in Washington. The New York Times this morning noted the map’s contribution to the public interest in an editorial: “It’s important to read this map not as a static record of farm sites or a mere inventory of animals,” the paper said. “It is really a map of overwhelming change and conflict. It raises two of the fundamental questions facing American agriculture. Do we pursue the logic of industrialism to its limits in a biological landscape? And how badly will doing so harm the landscape, the people who live in it and the democracy with which they govern themselves?”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

*

3 comments on “Flip: Interactively Documenting Factory Farms

  1. JTH says:

    Excellent piece

    Another aspect : look into corn ethanol projects.
    Byproduct of the process is low quality cattle feed.
    It is most economical to place a feedlot next to the ethanol plant rather than incur shipping costs. Result : groundwater contamination.

    Ethanol process needs water, manure waste contaminates it.
    http://www.ethanolproducer.com/article.jsp?article_id=2740

    “water efficiency of three to six gallons of water used per gallon of ethanol produced.”

    On this one I’ll say NIMBY

    I’ll try for free range proteins

  2. Chip, interesting assertion. So this is another potential downside of the ethanol craze? Keith

  3. JTH says:

    Keith
    My humble opinion … yes

    We discussed this at some TBEDC meeting with regards to proposed site south of TC

    Also:
    http://www.northernexpress.com/editorial/features.asp?id=2617
    Scroll down to sidebar “The Poop on Animal Factories”

    “CAFOs and ethanol refineries go hand in hand because livestock eat the corn byproduct produced by the refineries.”
    That’s relevant here because a company with plans to build a refinery in McBain is now talking to several farm operations about setting up operations, according to Rick Johnson, a partner with NextGen Energy LLC of Livonia, Michigan.
    “We’ll take [the corn byproduct] offsite if we have to, but we’d prefer not to do that,” he said.

    My humble opinion on ethanol: scrap protection for Florida Sugar, allow imports from Brazil.
    Corn ethanol is for the Iowa caucus…

    Ciao
    Chip