The Society of Foolhardy Folly: Anglers and Hunters Against the Environment
EMPIRE, MI — Days before ice crowded back into Lake Michigan’s Platte Bay late last week, the shallow waters opened and fishermen planted their poles in the soft sand at the mouth of the Platte River and waited for steelhead and maybe a brown trout. Clean, cold water is abundant in our region in large part due to the safeguards contained in the 1972 Clean Water Act, arguably the most important environmental protection statute in history.
The law set limits on multiple pollutants from multiple sources. American courts enforced its provisions. Governments around the world enacted their own versions of the clean water law. And in the United States cleaner water gave rise to multi-billion dollar fisheries, new shoreline development in the nation’s cities, hundreds of thousands of businesses and millions of jobs in the recreational economy, and the untold satisfaction that the United States once was capable of responding effectively to a big national problem.
But when I wandered up to the parking area the pickups sported troubling evidence of how estranged we are, how politically disembodied we’ve become. The anti-EPA bumper stickers were apparent. “Defund the EPA.” “Regulate the EPA.” The men so intent on securing the fish that swam in the clean water of Lake Michigan also were engaged in a political abstraction. They very clearly voted for the right’s insurgent lawmakers, men and women in our state Legislature and national Congress not at all interested in advancing a tradition of environmental safeguards.
Disagreement about the scope and intensity of environmental regulations is a half-century old in the United States. What’s more — if you ask GOP voters what regulation they’d like to weaken — one that makes the air and water dirtier, opens the meadow next door to toxic waste dumping, allows the favorite wetland to be filled — they most often don’t have an answer. That’s because most Americans appreciate the cleaner and safer country we’ve produced with our environmental protections. I know a Republican family in Kentucky who took a trip to China, breathed the filthy air, smelled the putrid water, and returned home with this vow: “I’ll never complain about the EPA again.”
Environmental regulations and the EPA, though, are part of the nihilistic GOP message machine that asserts nothing really matters except shrinking the government, lowering taxes, ending regulation, opposing gun control and hating Obama. That’s a management menu, while provocative, that offers not a single cogent response to the economic and ecological storms that are battering us now. The Democrats are less dangerous, but also not nearly as articulate and determined.
Neither party is ready to describe the risks of what we face, and the many changes that are required to build a new era of safety and prosperity. Certainly, defending the nation’s existing environmental safeguards is a priority.
Just in the U.S. over the last decade we’ve crashed the economy, drowned two cities, produced a class of the permanently jobless, replaced the proven strategy of public investment leveraging private development with a hopeless era of austerity, turned suburban malls, theaters, and schools into killing zones, dried up Texas and California, killed hundreds with Great Plains and southern tornadoes, put the focus of our energy development sector on producing more carbon saturated fossil fuels through fracking and less on carbon-light renewables.
We are told by the chattering classes that voters are poised to make things worse by giving the GOP control of the U.S. Senate. The GOP’s wealthy supporters, like the rich legions that support the Democrats, have sufficiently distanced themselves from the nation’s problems that they’ve become untouchable. The rest of us need to find ways to reach each other. We are a lot more united than we think.
We like clean air and don’t want it to get dirty again. We appreciate laws that reduce risks in the work place and keep children from becoming laborers. We want good schools, decent work, and energy efficiency. We want some measure of hope that what we see unfolding in front of us will produce pragmatic leaders and a new era of national resolve to face up to our challenges and fix them. We like to fish. And we like the clean water they swim in.
Since 2008, when he led a multi-media reporting team from Circle of Blue to the Murray-Darling basin, Australia’s prime food-growing region, Keith Schneider has reported from the front lines of five continents on the intensifying global confrontation between water, energy, and food. His work as senior editor and chief correspondent for Circle of Blue’s Global Choke Point project has taken him to the coal-producing deserts of China’s Yellow River Valley, the oil and gas fields of the American West, India’s wheat and rice basket in Punjab, Qatar’s mammoth Persian Gulf desalination plants, Mongolia's mineral rich and water scarce South Gobi desert, the Peruvian Andes, Panama's rainforests, and to United Nations climate conferences in New York, Copenhagen, Barcelona, and Tianjin. In documenting and assessing the consequences of rising demand for energy and food in an era of diminishing freshwater reserves, Keith is playing an essential role in writing a new 21st century narrative about the contest for scarce resources. On every continent, the steep increase in demand for coal, oil, natural gas, and grain — the largest users of water — crosses an equally sharp decline in available freshwater reserves. As Keith and his Circle of Blue colleagues have shown in exclusive online multi-media reports, the place where the trend vectors collide is reshaping the Earth’s environment, reordering national priorities, and deeply affecting national economies. In 2014, two of the six provisions in the U.S.-China climate agreement, a breakthrough in diplomacy, focused on the new data and fresh assessments of the ties between energy and water. Those details were brought directly to the leaders of both countries by Keith's reporting for Circle of Blue, and by his participation in speaking tours and convenings in China and the U.S. In 2012, the Rockefeller Foundation recognized Global Choke Point and Circle of Blue with its $100,000 Rockefeller Centennial Innovation Award. Keith also is a special correspondent in the United States for The New York Times, where he has reported on energy, urban affairs, technology, environment, agriculture, and cultural trends since 1981. He is the winner of numerous awards for his work as a journalist, program innovator, and editor including two George Polk Memorial Awards for environmental and national reporting, among the most prestigious in American journalism. He is a graduate of Haverford College, and writes from northern Michigan, where Circle of Blue is based, and where Keith has lived since 1993.