Behind New Generation Mineral Leases: More Money, Less Hazards

Arthur and Sharon Stottsberry in Marietta, Ohio a day before receiving a $280,000 mineral lease bonus check from Eclipse Energy. Photo/Keith Schneider

CALDWELL, Ohio — The day before they received a $280,000 check for leasing their oil and gas development rights to Eclipse Energy, Arthur and Sharon Stottsberry stopped in Marietta to remind their attorney that they had almost an acre more to lease. I caught up with the Stottsberrys as they were leaving Jennifer Garrison’s office, as ebullient and keyed up as a retired senior couple from this part of southeastern Ohio is likely to get at this stage.

“Saturday morning we’ll have that check in hand,” said Mrs. Stottsberry. “And then we’ll believe it actually happened. We haven’t planned much about what to do. But when the check comes we’ll plan. The most important thing is I want to make sure my grandkids do well.”

As she described the mix of tempered elation and modest disorientation that comes with a financial windfall, Mr. Stottsberry stood quietly by his wife’s side clutching the lease agreement that made much of the couple’s new prosperity possible. What’s more, that same agreement also contains enforceable safeguards for their water.

Jennifer Garrison, former Democratic state representative from Marietta, and the lead attorney developing mineral leases that ensure wealth and minimize environmental risk. Photo/Keith Schneider

The 24-page contract, largely designed and negotiated by Garrison, is a manifest of financial and environmental protection details that is pushing the old business of leasing oil and gas drilling rights into new legal and regulatory territory.

Until very recently most oil and gas leases in Ohio were a few pages long, spelling out standard royalty rates, modest bonus payments per acre of leased minerals, and no protections for water and land. They were most often hammered out by energy companies working one-on-one with mineral owners, many of them unskilled in the back and forth of negotiation, and unprepared emotionally to press for the best deal.

Over the last year, though, eastern and southeastern Ohio have emerged as a new stage in the shale  gas and shale oil production boom that has engulfed at least a dozen other states across the country. America’s deep shales are yielding a bonanza of oil and gas that is rewriting what the United States thought it knew about energy supplies. And it’s prompting a fresh reckoning with the potential hazards of hydrocarbon development, especially water supply and contamination.

Ohio’s deep Marcellus and Utica shales are said by state and federal geologists to contain trillions of cubic feet of gas and billions of barrels of oil. The early production logs in Ohio indicate that Utica shale wells are capable of producing millions of cubic feet of gas and hundreds of barrels of oil a day.

The mineral leases that Garrison negotiates with energy companies reflect the high public expectations about financial returns from Ohio’s new  energy fields. Her clients are receiving up to $5,250 an acre in bonus payments for a five-year lease. They also receive 20 percent royalties on gas and oil production. The lease signed by the Stottsberrys is one of two that Garrison has negotiated on behalf of nearly 300 clients who own 13,000 acres of mineral rights in two southeastern Ohio counties.

Still, drilling for energy that lies in solid rock about a mile beneath the surface takes millions of gallons of water injected into wells to fracture the formations and release gas and oil. Across the Ohio River, in the four-year-old shale gas fields of Pennsylvania and West Virginia, landowners have reported instances of water contamination near wells that have been “hydrofractured.” State regulators and the federal Environmental Protection Agency are investigating the causes. New state and federal regulations to protect water and air are starting to take effect in Texas, North Dakota, Pennsylvania and other states where shale oil and gas production is soaring.

Garrison’s clients, among them the Stottsberrys,  heard about the contamination incidents and expressed considerable resolve to prevent such damage on their land. The result is that her leases contain provisions for testing water before and after drilling occurs to make sure none of the chemicals used in the production process have contaminated drinking water. The leases also bar energy companies from drawing water for fracking from any water source on the leaseholders land. If there is a problem with the water, moreover, energy companies are required to address it immediately and provide a fresh water supply to the landowner. These provisions go well beyond existing Ohio regulations.

“My job is to represent landowners,” Garrison told me. “The mineral lease is the law of the land. We try to help landowners get what they want in their leases. And they wanted to make sure their water was safe.”

— Keith Schneider

 

Anadarko is probing Ohio's gas-bearing Utica shale with this rig in Noble County. Photo/Keith Schneider

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

*

3 comments on “Behind New Generation Mineral Leases: More Money, Less Hazards

  1. Jim Walker says:

    A good article about trying to balance economic and environmental concerns. It may not be perfect but it is light years beyond the old “broad form deed” that destroyed people’s land and livelihood in Kentucky in West Virginia.

  2. Rob says:

    You need to come do an article about Columbiana County Ohio. We have thousannds of acres in old Columbia Gas leases within storage field leases. Those leases call for only a two hundred dollar royalty annually for all gases. We just got letter from Columbia that they are partnering to develop those deeper hydrocarbons and the property owner will receive the royalty identufied in their lease. Pure exploitation. Columbia gas should be ashamed of themselves for taking advatage of people with these innaproriate leases. Mostn big storage field states have minimum royalty laws because of the old storage field leases, but ohio does not. Columbia Gas should man up. And our legislatures should address this massive inequity of disproportionate levels